about | contact | support  
 
 

Earthblog

A Real-World Joomla! Template

 
The River Gods: A Colorado Author Book Review PDF Print E-mail
Written by Charlie Malone   
Monday, 20 September 2010 14:49
therivergods

In The River Gods Brian Kiteley sifts time to touch the nature of our relationship to place. Brief, lithe glimpses of Kiteley’s childhood home, Northampton, Massachusetts, come through fictionalized versions of Kiteley’s own family, Massasoit Indians, colonial settlers caught up in Puritan religious fervor, the cast of the 1966 film version of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, President Calvin Coolidge, Sylvia Plath, Sojourner Truth, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and other less well-known inhabitants and visitors. Each voice offers a specific way of seeing a precise moment in the history of the town. Subtle, quick scenes, rarely over two pages pass by quickly. These scenes allow Kiteley to wonder at questions I often ask on walks through town: What must this place have looked like to someone hundreds of years ago? What drew people here? What does it mean to live here now, or to be from here or of here? The questions become reciprocal exploring in one instant how we, human culture as whole, shape the land, and how this same land, changed by our activities, changes us.

Kiteley gives the reader a nonlinear collection of diverse perspectives. We get nostalgic and charming scenes of childhood in lush, leafy forests and on streets lined with old houses. One chapter is largely just a list of street names. The town, and the reader, bear witness to a wide range of human experience: Kiteley’s own brother dies of AIDS. Women are put on trial for witchcraft. Adolescents explore sex. Death lingers. Nixon is President.

Finishing the book in Old Town, Fort Collins, CO, I feel deep resonances. Northampton is an old town, and a college town. It has a history of activism, and of experimental, communal-living rooted in the mid 1800s. Just as Fort Collins has its connection to Disney, Northampton served as the backdrop for several big films. Perhaps most simply, Northampton, like Fort Collins, has, at its heart, a river.

The River Gods is a challenging book. Composed of short scenes cut loose in time, the work of the book occurs in the reader during the space between chapters. The effect is like sedimentation along a riverbed, each layer adds to our understanding but only if we pause to consider what we have just read. It is easy to overlook that all these visions come from Kiteley himself. The choice of who, and what they see is his, and this defines the nature of the portrait. Take for example these two excerpts, which sit side-by-side in the book, one from a visitor to the town and one from Kiteley’s own grandfather:

From May 1985, Eric Kiteley, 82

“Geoff sits with his back to the table, legs kicked out from the bench. The river gurgles and swirls and swells. The leaves are only just budding. I study the sandwich for sometime, perhaps trying to retrieve a story from my memory, or maybe I’m worrying over my wife, whose memory is clearly failing.”

From June 1944, William Carlos Williams, 62

“The great poet Wallace Stevens and I walked halfway across the Coolidge Bridge over the Connecticut River, in Northampton, Massachusetts. It was a happy coincidence we were both in this handsome, dying mill town, he on business, me to meet my publisher in Cummington, a few miles up into the Berkshires. A white fog floated over the river. The steeples of Northampton flitted in and out of the moonlit mist.”

The gaze of the speaker, the touch of the writer, and the depth of subject, the work of time, and the risks of writing in this form are all hinted at here. You will most likely know twenty-five pages in if this book, and what it asks of the reader, are for you. For myself, with my specific way of thinking and at this precise moment in time, I couldn’t have asked for a more thought-provoking way of thinking about place.

 

 

Comments  

 
#6 2010-09-23 10:47
Who would have thought there'd be so much push-back against recognizing a fundamental distinction between the role of rivers in industrialized New England and semi-arid Colorado? I have to wonder if the "push-back" doesn't come from an impulse to justify a superficial review, rather than from a desire to understand "place" -- and the book -- better. Good writers sometimes write mediocre reviews. It happens. What matters daily is to distinguish "false relevancies" from what makes us unique.
Quote
 
 
#5 2010-09-23 08:54
3D, I think you're missing the point. It hardly seems a critical part of the review, it just adds relevancy for a Fort Collins audience. The question where you and the reviewer seem to differ is what does it mean for a river to be at the "heart" of something? If home to the reviewer includes the Poudre then it should be part of the review, right? Would it be more solipsistic to deny the validity of that perspective than to draw some loose "resonances"?

(Great Comp Class Mr. Malone)
Quote
 
 
#4 2010-09-23 05:29
A book about place deserves a better review than one relying on a false parallel between one place and another. At Matter – of all places – we'd agree that sustaining the Poudre means knowing its place in our region's history and how that place differs from, say, that of a New England mill town. No?
Quote
 
 
#3 2010-09-22 13:38
3d, what did you think of the book?
Quote
 
 
#2 2010-09-22 03:58
(continued from above) Northern Colorado might have the Poudre "at its heart", but Fort Collins does not.
Quote
 
 
#1 2010-09-22 03:58
The parallel to Fort Collins seems solipsist, inasmuch as the New England mill towns actually depended on the rivers running through them for hydraulic energy and transportation. Neither of which can be said about Fort Collins & its relationship with the Poudre. The river here has been a source of irrigation and recreation, both of which are rural activities that happen away from town and utterly different from what the river means/meant to Northampton's history and identity.
Quote
 
75°
24°
°F | °C
Clear
Humidity: 25%
Fri

46 | 82
7 | 27
Sat

39 | 64
3 | 17